One of the quotes in the beginning of the book (most likely paid to help sell the book) was from someone named William H Davidow, an author of a variety of marketing books regarding corporations and technology:
...Brown and Duguid argue convincingly that the context in which information is embedded is as important as the information itself. If information technology is to realize its promise, technologists must learn to take context into account.
I believe this quote supports Browns' argument that the information revolution is similar to the industrial revolution. Both are a
...period of time in which society learned how to process, sort, rearrange, recombine...in unprecedented fashion.
As librarians we are taught how to process/sort/rearrange/recombine as part of our knowledge set. Does this mean we have an advantage in the coming trends of web 2.0? I feel it is our nature to want to tag/categorize/identify information as we receive it and as Brown says "reduce knowledge into data." This is instinct for us...to break large information sets into smaller categories to make it easier to find/use later. This can only be an advantage if we are willing to embrace new technologies and have the ability within our environment/institutions to implement them.
Considering he wrote this initially in 2000 and updated portions in 2002...I wonder what he would have to say now with web 2.0 fulling engrossing corporations as well as library worlds?
1 comment:
Korrie, just wanted to say I know what you mean about coming from a different perspective. My past degree is in Economics. Though I do currently work in a library setting, I can never stop thinking in an econ state of mind!
Post a Comment